The journal is committed to maintaining the integrity of the scholarly record. Where errors are identified that affect the interpretation of the published work, the journal will issue corrections.
Articles may be retracted in cases of proven misconduct, redundant publication, plagiarism, or serious methodological error. In situations where an investigation is ongoing but concerns are significant, an expression of concern may be published.
All such actions follow the COPE Retraction Guidelines and are clearly linked to the original article.
Purpose of Retractions
Retractions at this journal are issued to correct the scholarly record when significant errors or ethical issues invalidate a published article’s findings or integrity. Retraction is not intended as a punishment but as a correction to the literature, in accordance with COPE guidelines.
Retraction Notices
Retraction notices will clearly identify the retracted article by title, authors, and DOI, provide the reason(s) for retraction, and be published promptly and freely accessible. These notices will be linked to the original article.
Occasionally a retraction will be used to correct errors in submission or publication such as infringements of professional ethical codes, such as multiple submission, bogus claims of authorship, plagiarism, fraudulent use of data etc. Standards for dealing with retractions have been developed by a number of library and scholarly bodies, and this best practice is adopted for article retraction by the publisher:
- A retraction note titled “Retraction: [article title]” signed by the authors and/or the editor is published in the paginated part of a subsequent issue of the journal and listed in the contents list.
- In the electronic version, a link is made to the original article.
- The online article is preceded by a screen containing the retraction note. It is to this screen that the link resolves; the reader can then proceed to the article itself.
- The original article is retained unchanged save for a watermark on the .pdf indicating on each page that it is “retracted.”
- The HTML version of the document is removed.
Article Removal: Legal limitations
In an extremely limited number of cases, it may be necessary to remove an article from the online database. This will only occur where the article is clearly defamatory, or infringes others’ legal rights, or where the article is, or we have good reason to expect it will be, the subject of a court order, or where the article, if acted upon, might pose a serious health risk. In these circumstances, while the metadata (Title and Authors) will be retained, the text will be replaced with a screen indicating the article has been removed for legal reasons.
Article Replacement
In cases where the article, if acted upon, might pose a serious health risk, the authors of the original article may wish to retract the flawed original and replace it with a corrected version. In these circumstances the procedures for retraction will be followed with the difference that the database retraction notice will publish a link to the corrected re-published article and a history of the document.
Erratum & Corrigendum
In the instance where errors are introduced to the article by the publisher an erratum will be published to the original article. All publisher-introduced changes are highlighted to the author at the proof stage and any errors are ideally identified by the author and corrected by the publisher before final publication.
Should the author wish to publish to a change to their article that at any time after acceptance a corrigendum will be published. Authors should contact the Co-Editors-in-Chief of the journal, who will determine the impact of the change and decide on the appropriate course of action.